The Psychology Behind Our Environment
" The degree to which we are
all involved in the control of the earth's life is just beginning to dawn on
most of us...meaning another revolution for human thought" (Thomas 195).
This quote was taken from Lewis Thomas's essay Natural Man in which he discusses the way in which humans
unknowingly have got themselves involved in the happenings of the environment.
I found this quote to be particularly interesting as it sets up a strong claim
that would later be dissected throughout the essay. Which are humans constantly
are debating about the hazardous conditions they live in and that our
environment is in danger due to pesticides, pollution, extinct species, etc. But
they do not realize that these very same issues are caused only by humans and
that they are also involved in the reasons of destruction in the environment.
Thomas proceeds to elaborate his argument off this ‘claim’ that I used as my
quote. His prose is agreeable to only a certain extent. Where most of his
argument focuses on blaming humans and how they “sit around and worry about
best to preserve the environment” and that they continue to bring damage to the
very same environment. But blaming someone is not going to get our environment
fixed. It is true, humans are part of the problem but sometimes, mother nature
turns upon her own creations and has her way with things. Such as terrible
natural disasters like hurricanes, tornadoes, tsunamis, you name it. To fix
these “environmental issues” humans were the only hope to get everything back
to something that was close to normal. Take Japan’s 2011 tsunami/earthquake incident that crushed the Japanese economy for example. They lost up to 120,000
buildings and around $199 billion dollars (about 16.9 trillion yen); according
to the Japanese government. And they are still recovering from minor damage
today. Thus, if humans didn’t do anything, then the environment would have
collapsed back in 2011 for Japan. To conclude, Thomas’s argument is valid but
sometimes could be manipulated to suit each scenario; and the quote does an
excellent job summing that up.
I thought this qualification of Thomas's argument was interesting because of your consideration of the environment's own "self-destruction". However, even if humans do not cause all environmental issues, to what extent do you believe we should work to protect the environment? Also, do you think humans or Mother Nature do more harm to the environment?
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI like your response to this quote because although you agreed, you made it clear that you only agreed to a certain extent and described your own viewpoint on the possible faults in the quote with the inclusion of evidence. Very well done!
ReplyDelete